Intel H3C XG310 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290
+103%
4.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Nov 2013
H3C Graphics
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
275W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO
(215-0852020)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.2 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
