Intel H3C XG310 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (1550MHz vs 1545MHz)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (10GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
+364%
11.07 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2020
Release Date
Jun 2021
H3C Graphics
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
10GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
37.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
74.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
4.762 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
2.381 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
595.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
250W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
