NVIDIA H200 NVL vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 141GB VRAM H200 NVL and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA H200 NVL 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (141GB vs 48GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4.89TB/s vs 960.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2505MHz vs 1785MHz)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
H200 NVL
60.32 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada
+50%
91.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2024
Release Date
Dec 2022
Server Hopper
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1593 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
141GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
4.89TB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
132
SM Count
142
16896
Shading Units
18176
528
TMUs
568
24
ROPs
192
528
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
942.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
241.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
60.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
30.16 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
300W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GH100
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102
Hopper
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
80 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
814 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
