Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +10800%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
8
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
23W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy