NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+431%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
27
SM Count
14
216
Shading Units
896
72
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
TU117
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
