NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320M and 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 120W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
9704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 320M
0.053 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
+61579%
32.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
76
24
Shading Units
9728
8
TMUs
304
8
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.2 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
510.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.69 TFLOPS
52.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.69 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
510.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
AD103
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
