NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
+128%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
