Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1650 GTO 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.54GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy