ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA A40 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 48GB VRAM A40 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A40 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (695.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
10712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
A40 PCIe
+116837%
37.42 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
695.8GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
84
40
Shading Units
10752
4
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
194.9 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
584.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
37.42 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
37.42 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
584.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GA102
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
