ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
+40%
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
40
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GT218
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
