ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Moore Threads MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 85W)
Moore Threads MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
MTT S50
+15259%
4.915 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
16
-
SM Count
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
