ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
2.0
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
4.1
