Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
220W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
Navi 48
-
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Rage 9
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
Unknown
92 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net