ATI FireMV 2250 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
22 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
