ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 SE 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
8 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
8
4
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
G98S
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
UMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
