ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 3
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
