ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 49W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.06GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
May 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
40.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.368 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
803.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.47 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
GK208-400-A1
R500
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
