Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W4300

ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Dec 2015
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Bonaire
-
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
R500
Architecture
GCN 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy