ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
+525%
1.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
FireGL
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
800
8
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV770
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
