Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Lower TDP (31W vs 89W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600 +392%
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

89W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT218
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net