NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2130MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+57%
12 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 40HX
1174
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+125%
2649
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Feb 2024
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
22
2304
Shading Units
2816
144
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
288
Tensor Cores
88
36
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
AD107
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
