Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +33422%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
28W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy