Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
Lower TDP (70W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +73%
13.82 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2021
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
26
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
3328
240
TMUs
104
120
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ampere
Intel
Foundry
Samsung
10 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
12 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
70W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy