Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +1501%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
7680
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy