Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +3099%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
240
240
TMUs
40
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy