Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1229GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+279%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2023
Xe Graphics
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
16384
240
TMUs
1024
120
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
600W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8 billion
Transistors
100 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
