Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (2250MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +757%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1725 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
40
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
160
6
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy