NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1425MHz vs 1400MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 45W)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+96%
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Desktop
Type
Integrated
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
64bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.301 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
