NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 31W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
+2705%
1.094 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
31W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
