Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G4 and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1219MHz vs 1100MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics G4
0.845 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+47%
1.248 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Xe Graphics G4
751
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+58%
1194
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Xe Graphics G4
355
Radeon Pro WX 3100
+53%
544
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jun 2017
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Integrated
Type
Desktop
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
4GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
128bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
12
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
0 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
13.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
26.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tiger Lake GT2
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.2 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
