RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared a Professional market GPU: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and a Mobile platform GPU: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.02TB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (2010MHz vs 1746MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+8%
13410
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12350
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Professional
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
24
3840
Shading Units
3072
240
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
48
192
Tensor Cores
96
48
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
50W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
AD107
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
