Quadro P2000 vs RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1480MHz vs 1335MHz)
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3031
RTX A500 Embedded
+80%
5468
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000
+13%
2973
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
16
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
40
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA107S
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
