Quadro K5000 SYNC vs GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (122W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
GRID K260Q
+5%
2289
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
1536
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
