Quadro K5000 SYNC vs GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
GRID RTX T10 16
+360%
9999
Graphics Card
Jan 2013
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
1536
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
22.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
90.37 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
2.169 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
90.37 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
122W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
