Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K2200M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 65W)
Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro K2200M
+16%
854
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
