Quadro K2000 vs Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 260W)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
+1861%
14380
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
72
384
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU102
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
