Quadro K2000 vs Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.29GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
+74%
1280
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
15W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GA10B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
Unknown
118 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7