Quadro K2000 vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+995%
8033
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
