Quadro K2000 vs Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+69%
733
Quadro 3000M
432
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
5
384
Shading Units
240
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
