Quadro FX 880M vs Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
4048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
116
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+14374%
16790
Graphics Card
Jan 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
DG2-512
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
