Home Comparison Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro P2000 Mobile +543%
2974

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
9
192
Shading Units
1152
64
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP106
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net