Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro P1000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (47W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro P1000
+309%
1894
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
5
192
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
47W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
