Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
+38%
640
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
34.14GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1280 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
640.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
10W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA10B
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
