Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro K4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro K4000M
+149%
1154
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
