Quadro FX 360M vs RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 230W)
RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
10224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
RTX A5500
+131053%
34100
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
80
16
Shading Units
10240
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA102
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
