Quadro FX 360M vs GRID K520
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)
GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
GRID K520
+8703%
2289
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GK104
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
