Quadro FX 360M vs L4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 72W)
L4 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
7408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
L4
+116400%
30290
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
60
16
Shading Units
7424
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
72W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
AD104
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8