Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon Vega 3 Embedded
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Vega 3 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Radeon Vega 3 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1200MHz vs 1150MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+59%
736
Radeon Vega 3 Embedded
461
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2019
HD Graphics
Generation
Picasso
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
320
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
921.6 GFLOPS
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
460.8 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
10W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Picasso
Generation 7.5
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
22 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.94 billion
Unknown
Die Size
210 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.0
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
