Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0 VRAM Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2200MHz vs 1150MHz)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
736
Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile
+435%
3942
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
HD Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Dependent
Bandwidth
Render Config
320
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
24
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Meteor Lake GT1
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Xe-LPG
Intel
Foundry
Intel
22 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
