Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon Graphics 384SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1500MHz vs 1150MHz)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
736
Radeon Graphics 384SP
+56%
1152
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2020
HD Graphics
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
320
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.304 TFLOPS
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1152 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Renoir
Generation 7.5
Architecture
GCN 5.1
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
9.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.0
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4